Buckeye Boneheads

It is all so drearily predictable. After the “stunning victory” by the Orange Man in early November, we were treated to an absolutely bizarre spectacle of less than a dozen masked dudes with swastika flags marching in Columbus, Ohio: Neo-Nazi march in Columbus draws rebuke from President Joe Biden. The responses were what you would expect, and these guys did their shtick and then disappeared back into the ether from whence they came (also known as the FBI field offices where they work). Many claimed right on cue that “LITERAL NAZIS” were emboldened by the victory for “LITERAL HITLER”. No one had heard of these guys and they disappeared afterward, never appearing in the news except for references to “LITERAL NAZIS” marching in Columbus. No one found this odd or asked any questions of course.

The rare curious type might have pondered: what was the point of this display? They came in, marched and then went back to their FBI cubicles secret Nazi lair and that was it. Really? Why?

The average normie won’t wonder. Nazis are literally the worst possible people so their motivations are as simple as “being bad”. Why else would people wearing masks march around for a couple of minutes, just long enough to get on camera before disappearing?

Oh.

A bill advancing through the Statehouse would cement a definition of antisemitism into Ohio law and expand the criminal offense of ethnic intimidation.

Senate Bill 297 passed with a 27-4 vote in the Ohio Senate on Dec. 11 to define antisemitism as “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.” Adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, the definition also states “rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

If signed into law, the antisemitism definition would be used when state agencies investigate ethnic intimidation, which S.B. 297 defines as “the offenses of riot and aggravated riot committed by reason of the race, color, religion, or national origin of another person or group.”

Sen. Terry Johnson (R-McDermott), the bill’s primary sponsor, said the legislation is needed given “antisemitism is seemingly on the rise in these institutions of higher education,” citing demonstrations on Ohio State University’s campus earlier this year and a neo-Nazi march in Columbus in November. Johnson said Jewish students “have increasingly found themselves facing discrimination, harassment and even violence.”

“Such experiences not only create a hostile environment for Jewish students, for also undermine the very principles of diversity and inclusion that our universities are supposed to uphold,” said Johnson shortly before the bill passed. “It is essential for campuses, especially our state universities, to actively investigate and address antisemitism.”

^{https://archive.vn/KAY8X}

Hey Terry…can I call you Terry? Where were you for the last couple of decades when overt anti-White rhetoric has been commonplace on campus and not only not condemned but celebrated and rewarded? Meanwhile….

Khalid Turaani, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations of Ohio, echoed Antonio’s concerns in testimony he submitted against S.B. 297, arguing that the legislation is redundant and infringes on First Amendment rights.

When someone tells you about “Judeo-Christian values”, remember that while the Muslim guy seems to understand the First Amendment, the Jews and their “conservative”/evangelical lapdogs apparently don’t.

What you see is what They want you to see and most of it is a form of kabuki theater to convince you to sign away your rights. The definition of “antisemitism”, a form of speech protected like all political speech under the First Amendment, is so broad that my blog posts critical of Jews and the state of Israel might be illegal in Ohio, just a few miles from where I sit.

Fear not. That won’t stop me from Noticing.